TANTRUMP.org

A factual log of presidential escalations

← Back to entries

Fired U.S. Attorney in Virginia after conflicts over illegal appointment

January 12, 2026

3
Level

Multiple Guardrails

Founders' Principles Violated

Guardrails Violated

Trigger

Robert K. McBride was fired as First Assistant U.S. Attorney in Eastern District of Virginia on January 12, 2026, after conflicts with Lindsey Halligan, whose appointment had earlier been ruled unlawful by a federal judge. Critics argued the firing was politically motivated.

Action Taken

Fired Robert K. McBride as First Assistant U.S. Attorney in Eastern District of Virginia on January 12, 2026, after conflicts with Lindsey Halligan, whose appointment had earlier been ruled unlawful by a federal judge. The firing raised questions about prosecutorial independence and political interference in DOJ. Critics argued the firing was politically motivated retaliation. Legal experts warned this undermined prosecutorial independence and DOJ integrity.

In His Own Words

"We need prosecutors who are aligned with our mission."

"The U.S. Attorney serves at the pleasure of the president."

"We will remove prosecutors who obstruct our agenda."

What's Wrong

Firing of U.S. Attorney after conflicts over illegal appointment raises questions about prosecutorial independence. The firing came after federal judge ruled Halligan's appointment unlawful. Critics argued the firing was politically motivated retaliation. Legal experts warned this undermined prosecutorial independence and DOJ integrity.

Impact

Institutional: Undermines prosecutorial independence and DOJ integrity. Legal: Questions about political interference in law enforcement. Operational: Creates fear and uncertainty among federal prosecutors. Political: Bipartisan criticism of DOJ politicization.

Sources & Full Details

Primary Sources

Background

Robert K. McBride was fired as First Assistant U.S. Attorney in Eastern District of Virginia on January 12, 2026, after conflicts with Lindsey Halligan, whose appointment had earlier been ruled unlawful by a federal judge. The firing raised questions about prosecutorial independence and political interference in DOJ. Critics argued the firing was politically motivated retaliation.

Why Level 3?

Multiple guardrails bypassed: institutional oversight, separation of powers, due process. Measurable harm to prosecutorial independence and DOJ integrity. Firing after conflicts over illegal appointment raises questions about political motivation.